Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Gravity gradient suppression in spaceborne atomic tests of the equivalence principle

arXiv
Authors: Sheng-wey Chiow, Jason Williams, Nan Yu, Holger Müller

Year

2016

Paper ID

41993

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

100

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The gravity gradient is one of the most serious systematic effects in atomic tests of the equivalence principle (EP). While differential acceleration measurements performed with different atomic species under free fall test the validity of EP, minute displacements between the test masses in a gravity gradient produces a false EP-violating signal that limits the precision of the test. We show that gravity inversion and modulation using a gimbal mount can suppress the systematics due to gravity gradients caused by both moving and stationary parts of the instrument as well as the environment, strongly reducing the need to overlap two species.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The gravity gradient is one of the most serious systematic effects in atomic tests of the equivalence principle (EP).

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #41993 #68456 Analytic Properties of the Jost... #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ... #68453 Weak wave turbulence as a precu... #68449 Scale-Invariant Open Quantum Sy...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.