Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Foundations
The arrow of time and the Bell inequalities
arXiv
Authors: Emilio Santos
Year
2016
Paper ID
41970
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
108
Citations
N/A
Abstract
It is recalled that closed (isolated) systems are essentially reversible whilst open systems like the Earth, or living beings on it, are irreversible because they are not isolated. Earth and life irreversibility derives from the evolution of the universe, which is a consequence of its special initial conditions. It is stressed that, although relativity theory forbids that information travels faster than light, it does not forbid influences of an event on its past light cone. Therefore the violation of Bell inequalities in loophole-free experiments is compatible with relativity theory. A correlation formula, alternative to Bell's, is proposed as the starting point for hidden variables models fitting in relativity.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- It is recalled that closed (isolated) systems are essentially reversible whilst open systems like the Earth, or living beings on it, are irreversible because they are not isolated.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.