Quick Navigation

Topics

Topological Quantum Computing Quantum Gravity Relativistic Quantum Information Quantum Entropy Information Measures Quantum Software Tools Programming

Octonionic two-qubit separability probability conjectures

arXiv
Authors: Paul B. Slater

Year

2016

Paper ID

41940

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

140

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We study, further, a conjectured formula for generalized two-qubit Hilbert-Schmidt separability probabilities that has recently been proven by Lovas and Andai (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.01410.pdf) for its real (two-rebit) asserted value $frac{29}{64}$, and that has also been very strongly supported numerically for its complex $frac{8}{33}$, and quaternionic $frac{26}{323}$ counterparts. Now, we seek to test the presumptive octonionic value of frac{44482}{4091349} approx 0.0108722. We are somewhat encouraged by certain numerical computations, indicating that this (51-dimensional) instance of the conjecture might be fulfilled by setting a certain determinantal-power parameter a, introduced by Forrester (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.08081.pdf), to 0 (or possibly near to 0). Hilbert-Schmidt measure being the case k=0 of random induced measure, for k=1, the corresponding octonionic separability probability conjecture is frac{7612846}{293213345} approx 0.0259635, while for k=2, it is frac{4893392}{95041567} approx 0.0514869, ldots. The relation between the parameters a and k is explored.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #41940 #67322 Super-diffusive transport in tw... #67300 Non-invertible SPT, gauging and...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.