Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Circuit Design Gate Engineering Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance

Minimization of AND-XOR Expressions with Decoders for Quantum Circuits

arXiv
Authors: Sonia Yang, Ali Al-Bayaty, Marek Perkowski

Year

2026

Paper ID

4193

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

159

Citations

N/A

Abstract

This paper introduces a new logic structure for reversible quantum circuit synthesis. Our synthesis method aims to minimize the quantum cost of reversible quantum circuits with decoders. In this method, multi-valued input, binary output (MVI) functions are utilized as a mathematical concept only, but the circuits are binary. We introduce the new concept of ``Multi-Valued Input Fixed Polarity Reed-Muller (MVI-RM)" forms. Our decoder-based circuit uses three logical levels in contrast to commonly-used methods based on Exclusive-or Sum of Products (ESOP) with two levels (AND-XOR expressions), realized by Toffoli gates. In general, the high number of input qubits in the resulting Toffoli gates is a problem that greatly impacts the quantum cost. Using decoders decreases the number of input qubits in these Toffoli gates. We present two practical algorithms for three-level circuit synthesis by finding the MVI-FPRM: products-matching and the newly developed butterfly diagrams. The best MVI-FPRM forms are factorized and reduced to approximate Multi-Valued Input Generalized Reed-Muller (MVI-GRM) forms.

Paper Tools

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Compare Add to Reading List

Category Correction Request

Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.

Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.

Log In to Submit

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #4193 #25311 Synthesis of Arbitrary Quantum ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.