Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication Related

Topics

Superconducting Qubits

Fisher information of two superconducting charge qubits under dephasing noisy

arXiv

Authors: Hamada El-Shiekh Nour Zidan, Nasser Metwally

Year

2016

Paper ID

41906

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The dynamics of a charged two-qubit system prepared initially in a maximum entangled state is discussed, where each qubit interacts independently with a dephasing channel. The Fisher information is used to estimate the channel and the energy parameters. Moreover, the contribution from different parts of Fisher information is discussed. We show that, the degree of estimation of any parameter depends on the initial value of this parameter. It turns out that the upper bounds of Fisher information with respect to the dephasing parameter increase and that corresponding to coupling parameter decreases as the initial energy of each qubit increases.

Why This Paper Matters

This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
The dynamics of a charged two-qubit system prepared initially in a maximum entangled state is discussed, where each qubit interacts independently with a dephasing channel.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/arXiv:1612.03324 [2] arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.03324 [3] Publisher https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.03324

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0

Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.