Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Weak equivalence principle in noncommutative phase space and the parameters of noncommutativity
arXiv
Authors: Kh. P. Gnatenko, V. M. Tkachuk
Year
2016
Paper ID
41677
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
109
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The weak equivalence principle is studied in a space with noncommutativity of coordinates and noncommutativity of momenta. We find conditions on the parameters of noncommutativity which give the possibility to recover the equivalence principle in noncommutative phase space. It is also shown that in the case when these conditions are satisfied the motion of the center-of-mass of a composite system in noncommutative phase space and the relative motion are independent, the kinetic energy of composite system has additivity property and is independent on the systems composition. So, we propose conditions on the parameters of noncommutativity which give the possibility to solve the list of problems in noncommutative phase space.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The weak equivalence principle is studied in a space with noncommutativity of coordinates and noncommutativity of momenta.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.