Quick Navigation

Topics

Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing

Cryogenic photoluminescence imaging system for nanoscale positioning of single quantum emitters

arXiv
Authors: Jin Liu, Macelo Davanco, Luca Sapienza, Kumarasiri Konthasinghe, Jose Vinicius De Miranda Cardoso, Jin Dong Song, Antonio Badolato, Kartik Srinivasan

Year

2016

Paper ID

41655

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

140

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We report a photoluminescence imaging system for locating single quantum emitters with respect to alignment features. Samples are interrogated in a 4 K closed-cycle cryostat by a high numerical aperture NA=0.9, 100$times$ magnification objective that sits within the cryostat, enabling high efficiency collection of emitted photons without image distortions due to the cryostat windows. The locations of single InAs/GaAs quantum dots within a >50 μm times 50 μm field of view are determined with approx4.5 nm uncertainty (one standard deviation) in a 1 s long acquisition. The uncertainty is determined through a combination of a maximum likelihood estimate for localizing the quantum dot emission, and a cross-correlation method for determining the alignment mark center. This location technique can be an important step in the high-throughput creation of nanophotonic devices that rely upon the interaction of highly confined optical modes with single quantum emitters.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #41655 #67294 Unveiling the 3D Morphology of ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.