!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Foundations

Leggett-Garg inequalities in the quantum field theory of neutrino oscillations

arXiv
Authors: Massimo Blasone, Fabrizio Illuminati, Luciano Petruzziello, Luca Smaldone

Year

2021

Paper ID

41467

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

90

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We investigate Leggett-Garg temporal inequalities in flavor-mixing processes. We derive an exact flavor-mass uncertainty product and we establish that it is an upper bound to the violation of the inequalities. This finding relates temporal nonclassicality to quantum uncertainty and provides a time analog of the Tsirelson upper bound to the violation of the spatial Bell inequalities. By studying the problem both in the exact field-theoretical setting and in the limiting quantum mechanical approximation, we show that Leggett-Garg inequalities are violated more strongly in quantum field theory than in quantum mechanics.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We investigate Leggett-Garg temporal inequalities in flavor-mixing processes.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #41467 #78817 Modelling Josephson Junctions w... #78814 Construction of isoscattering n... #78811 Autonomous Code Migration for Q... #78808 Experimental generation of asym...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.