!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Non-NP-Hardness of Translationally-Invariant Spin-Model Problems
arXiv
Authors: Rotem Liss, Tal Mor, Roman Shapira
Year
2021
Paper ID
41463
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
121
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Finding the ground state energy of the Heisenberg Hamiltonian is an important problem in the field of condensed matter physics. In some configurations, such as the antiferromagnetic translationally-invariant case on the 2D square lattice, its exact ground state energy is still unknown. We show that finding the ground state energy of the Heisenberg model cannot be an NP-Hard problem unless P=NP. We prove this result using a reduction to a sparse set and certain theorems from computational complexity theory. The result hints at the potential tractability of the problem and encourages further research towards a positive complexity result. In addition, we prove similar results for many similarly structured Hamiltonian problems, including certain forms of the Ising, t-J, and Fermi-Hubbard models.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Finding the ground state energy of the Heisenberg Hamiltonian is an important problem in the field of condensed matter physics.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.