Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

The quantum Gaussian process state: A kernel-inspired state with quantum support data

arXiv
Authors: Yannic Rath, George H. Booth

Year

2021

Paper ID

41445

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

92

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We introduce the quantum Gaussian process state, motivated via a statistical inference for the wave function supported by a data set of unentangled product states. We show that this condenses down to a compact and expressive parametric form, with a variational flexibility shown to be competitive or surpassing established alternatives. The connections of the state to its roots as a Bayesian inference machine as well as matrix product states, also allow for efficient deterministic training of global states from small training data with enhanced generalization, including on application to frustrated spin physics.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We introduce the quantum Gaussian process state, motivated via a statistical inference for the wave function supported by a data set of unentangled product states.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #41445 #69039 SAT, MaxSAT, and SMT for QLDPC ... #69038 Physically Constrained Ensemble... #69023 Scalable Quantum Algorithms for... #69016 Solution of the Equation-of-Mot...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.