Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Error Probability Mitigation in Quantum Reading using Classical Codes
arXiv
Authors: Francisco Revson Fernandes Pereira, Stefano Mancini
Year
2021
Paper ID
41406
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
187
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A general framework describing the statistical discrimination of an ensemble of quantum channels is given by the name of quantum reading. Several tools can be applied in quantum reading to reduce the error probability in distinguishing the ensemble of channels. Classical and quantum codes can be envisioned for this goal. The aim of this paper is to present a simple but fruitful protocol for this task using classical error-correcting codes. Three families of codes are considered: Reed-Solomon codes, BCH codes, and Reed-Muller codes. In conjunction to the use of codes, we also analyze the role of the receiver. In particular, heterodyne and Dolinar receivers are taken in consideration. The encoding and measurement schemes are connected by the probing step. As probe we consider coherent states. In such simple manner, interesting results are obtained. As we show, for any fixed rate and code, there is a threshold under which using codes surpass optimal and sophisticated schemes. However, there are codes and receiver schemes giving lower thresholds. BCH codes in conjunction with Dolinar receiver turn out to be the optimal strategy for error mitigation in the quantum reading task.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A general framework describing the statistical discrimination of an ensemble of quantum channels is given by the name of quantum reading.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.