Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Detection-loophole-free nonlocality in the simplest scenario
arXiv
Authors: Nandana T Raveendranath, Travis J. Baker, Emanuele Polino, Marwan Haddara, Lynden K. Shalm, Varun B. Verma, Geoff J. Pryde, Sergei Slussarenko, Howard M. Wiseman, Nora Tischler
Year
2026
Paper ID
4138
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
109
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Loophole-free quantum nonlocality often demands experiments with high complexity (defined by all parties' settings and outcomes) and multiple efficient detectors. Here, we identify the fundamental efficiency and complexity thresholds for quantum steering using two-qubit entangled states. Remarkably, it requires only one photon detector on the untrusted side, with efficiency ε> 1/X, where X geq 2 is the number of settings on that side. This threshold applies to all pure entangled states, in contrast to analogous Bell-nonlocality tests, which require almost unentangled states to be loss-tolerant. We confirm these predictions in a minimal-complexity $X = 2$ for the untrusted party and a single three-outcome measurement for the trusted party, detection-loophole-free photonic experiment with ε= \(51.6 pm 0.4\)\%.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Loophole-free quantum nonlocality often demands experiments with high complexity (defined by all parties' settings and outcomes) and multiple efficient detectors.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.