Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Analysis of the Classical Trajectory Treatment of Photon Dynamics for Polaritonic Phenomena
arXiv
Authors: Bart Rosenzweig, Norah M. Hoffmann, Lionel Lacombe, Neepa T. Maitra
Year
2021
Paper ID
41355
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
110
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Simulating photon dynamics in strong light-matter coupling situations via classical trajectories is proving to be powerful and practical. Here we analyze the performance of the approach through the lens of the exact factorization approach. Since the exact factorization enables a rigorous definition of the potentials driving the photonic motion it allows us to identify that the cause of the underestimation of photon number and intensities observed in earlier work is primarily due to an inadequate accounting of light-matter correlation in the classical Ehrenfest force rather than errors from treating the photons quasiclassically per se. The latter becomes problematic when the number of photons per mode begins to exceed a half.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Simulating photon dynamics in strong light-matter coupling situations via classical trajectories is proving to be powerful and practical.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.