Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Improvement of the Envelope Theory for Systems with Different Particles
arXiv
Authors: Cyrille Chevalier, Cintia T. Willemyns, Lorenzo Cimino, Claude Semay
Year
2021
Paper ID
41267
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
137
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The envelope theory is a method to compute approximate eigensolutions of quantum N-body Hamiltonians with a quite general structure in D dimensions. The advantages of the method are that it is easy to implement and that N is treated as any other parameters of the Hamiltonian, allowing the computation for systems of all sizes. If solutions are reliable, they are generally not very accurate. In the case of systems with identical particles for D ge 2, it is possible to improve the precision of the eigenvalues by combining the envelope theory with a generalisation to N-body of the dominantly orbital state method. It is shown that a similar improvement can be achieved in the case of systems composed of identical particles plus a different one. The quality of the new procedure is tested with different systems.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The envelope theory is a method to compute approximate eigensolutions of quantum N-body Hamiltonians with a quite general structure in D dimensions.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.