Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Absence versus Presence of Dissipative Quantum Phase Transition in Josephson Junctions
arXiv
Authors: Kanta Masuki, Hiroyuki Sudo, Masaki Oshikawa, Yuto Ashida
Year
2021
Paper ID
41244
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
165
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Dissipative quantum phase transition has been widely believed to occur in a Josephson junction coupled to a resistor despite a lack of concrete experimental evidence. Here, on the basis of both numerical and analytical nonperturbative renormalization group (RG) analyses, we reveal breakdown of previous perturbative arguments and defy the common wisdom that the transition always occurs at the quantum resistance RQ = h/\(4e2\). We find that RG flows in nonperturbative regimes induce nonmonotonic renormalization of the charging energy and lead to a qualitatively different phase diagram, where the insulator phase is strongly suppressed to the deep charge regime (Cooper pair box), while the system is always superconducting in the transmon regime. We identify a previously overlooked dangerously irrelevant term as an origin of the failure of conventional understandings. Our predictions can be tested in recent experiments realizing high-impedance long superconducting waveguides and would provide a solution to the long-standing controversy about the fate of dissipative quantum phase transition in the resistively shunted Josephson junction.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Dissipative quantum phase transition has been widely believed to occur in a Josephson junction coupled to a resistor despite a lack of concrete experimental evidence.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.