Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Volumes of parent Hamiltonians for benchmarking quantum simulators

arXiv
Authors: María García Díaz, Gael Sentís, Ramon Muñoz-Tapia, Anna Sanpera

Year

2021

Paper ID

41236

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

110

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We investigate the relative volume of parent Hamiltonians having a target ground state up to some fixed error ε, a quantity which sets a benchmark on the performance of quantum simulators. For vanishing error, this relative volume is of measure zero, whereas for a generic ε we show that it increases with the dimension of the Hilbert space. We also address the volume of parent Hamiltonians when they are restricted to be local. For translationally invariant Hamiltonians, we provide an upper bound to their relative volume. Finally, we estimate numerically the relative volume of parent Hamiltonians when the target state is the ground state of the Ising chain in a transverse field.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We investigate the relative volume of parent Hamiltonians having a target ground state up to some fixed error ε, a quantity which sets a benchmark on the performance of quantum...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #41236 #69983 Spectral Leakage and Masking Ef... #69982 Dimensionality Reduction of QAO... #69981 A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Appr... #69980 Complexity Inequalities for Qua...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.