Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Investigating the usefulness of Quantum Blur

arXiv
Authors: James R. Wootton, Marcel Pfaffhauser

Year

2021

Paper ID

41228

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

119

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Though some years remain before quantum computation can fully outperform conventional computation, it already provides resources that can be used for exploratory purposes in various fields. This includes certain tasks for procedural generation in computer games, music and art. The so-called `Quantum Blur' method represents the first step on this journey, providing a simple proof-of-principle example of how quantum software can be useful in these areas today. Here we analyse the `Quantum Blur' method and compare it to conventional blur effects. This investigation was guided by discussions with the most prominent user of the method, to determine which features were found most useful. In particular we determine how these features depend on the quantum phenomena of superposition and entanglement.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Though some years remain before quantum computation can fully outperform conventional computation, it already provides resources that can be used for exploratory purposes in...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #41228 #69983 Spectral Leakage and Masking Ef... #69982 Dimensionality Reduction of QAO... #69981 A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Appr... #69980 Complexity Inequalities for Qua...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.