Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
An Interpretation of Quantum Foundations Based on Density Functional Theory and Polymer Self-Consistent Field Theory
arXiv
Authors: Russell B. Thompson
Year
2021
Paper ID
41208
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
155
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The Feynman quantum-classical isomorphism between classical statistical mechanics in 3+1 dimensions and quantum statistical mechanics in 3 dimensions is used to connect classical polymer self-consistent field theory with quantum time-dependent density functional theory. This allows the theorems of density functional theory to relate non-relativistic quantum mechanics back to a classical statistical mechanical derivation of polymer self-consistent field theory for ring polymers in a 4 dimensional thermal-space. One dynamic postulate is added to two static postulates which allows for a complete description of quantum physics from a 5 dimensional thermal-space-time ensemble perspective which also removes the measurement problem. In the classical limit, a cylinder condition naturally arises as the thermal dimension becomes irrelevant, providing a justification for using 5 dimensions and a cylinder condition in general relativity, which is known to produce 4 dimensional space-time gravity and Maxwell's equations. Thus, in this approach, the postulates of electromagnetism become derived results of a special case of a ring polymer interpretation of quantum foundations.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The Feynman quantum-classical isomorphism between classical statistical mechanics in 3+1 dimensions and quantum statistical mechanics in 3 dimensions is used to connect...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.