Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Gravity Relativistic Quantum Information
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum power: a Lorentz invariant approach to Hawking radiation
arXiv
Authors: Michael R. R. Good, Eric V. Linder
Year
2021
Paper ID
41149
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
122
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Particle radiation from black holes has an observed emission power depending on the surface gravity κ= c4/(4GM) as \begin{equation}\nonumber P_{\textrm{black hole}} \sim \frac{\hbar κ^2}{6πc^2} = \frac{\hbar c^6}{96πG^2 M^2}\,,\end{equation} while both the radiation from accelerating particles and moving mirrors (accelerating boundaries) obey similar relativistic Larmor powers, \begin{equation}\nonumber P_{\textrm{electron}}= \frac{q^2α^2}{6πε_0 c^3}\,, \quad P_{\textrm{mirror}} =\frac{\hbar α^2}{6πc^2}\,, \end{equation} where α is the Lorentz invariant proper acceleration. This equivalence between the Lorentz invariant powers suggests a close relation that could be used to understand black hole radiation. We show that an accelerating mirror with a prolonged metastable acceleration plateau can provide a unitary, thermal, energy-conserved analog model for black hole decay.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Gravity & Relativistic Quantum Information research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Particle radiation from black holes has an observed emission power depending on the surface gravity κ= c^4/(4GM) as beginequationnonumber P_textrmblack hole sim frachbar...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.