Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Characterization of an atom interferometer in the quasi-Bragg regime
arXiv
Authors: Ashley Béguin, Tangui Rodzinka, Jacques Vigué, Baptiste Allard, Alexandre Gauguet
Year
2021
Paper ID
40937
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
104
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We provide a comprehensive study of ultra-cold atom diffraction by an optical lattice. We focus on an intermediate regime between the Raman-Nath and the Bragg regimes, the so-called quasi-Bragg regime. The experimental results are in a good agreement with a full numerical integration of the Schrödinger equation. We investigate the long pulse regime limited by a strong velocity selection and the short pulse regime limited by non-adiabatic losses. For each of these regimes, we estimate the multi-port features of the Bragg interferometers. Finally, we discuss the best compromise between these two regimes, considering the diffraction phase shift and the existence of parasitic interferometers.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We provide a comprehensive study of ultra-cold atom diffraction by an optical lattice.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.