Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Analytical and experimental study of center line miscalibrations in Mølmer-Sørensen gates
arXiv
Authors: Fernando Martínez-García, Lukas Gerster, Davide Vodola, Pavel Hrmo, Thomas Monz, Philipp Schindler, Markus Müller
Year
2021
Paper ID
40793
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
184
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A major challenge for the realisation of useful universal quantum computers is achieving high fidelity two-qubit entangling gate operations. However, calibration errors can affect the quantum gate operations and limit their fidelity. To reduce such errors it is desirable to have an analytical understanding and quantitative predictions of the effects that miscalibrations of gate parameters have on the gate performance. In this work, we study a systematic perturbative expansion in miscalibrated parameters of the Molmer-Sorensen entangling gate, which is widely used in trapped ion quantum processors. Our analytical treatment particularly focuses on systematic center line detuning miscalibrations. Via a unitary Magnus expansion, we compute the gate evolution operator which allows us to obtain relevant key properties such as relative phases, electronic populations, quantum state purity and fidelities. These quantities, subsequently, are used to assess the performance of the gate using the fidelity of entangled states as performance metric. We verify the predictions from our model by benchmarking them against measurements in a trapped-ion quantum processor. The method and the results presented here can help design and calibrate high-fidelity gate operations of large-scale quantum computers.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A major challenge for the realisation of useful universal quantum computers is achieving high fidelity two-qubit entangling gate operations.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.