Quick Navigation
Topics
Qubit Coherence Noise Stability Characterization
Long-lived state of a helium-like magnesium donor in silicon
arXiv
Authors: R. Kh. Zhukavin, D. A. Postnov, P. A. Bushuikin, K. E. Kudryavtsev, K. A. Kovalevsky, V. V. Tsyplenkov, N. A. Bekin, A. N. Lodygin, L. M. Portsel, V. B. Shuman, Yu. A. Astrov, N. V. Abrosimov, V. N. Shastin
Year
2026
Paper ID
4078
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
79
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The relaxation of ortho states of a helium-like Mg donor in silicon is investigated by measuring the modulation of background radiation transmission through impurity centers under pulsed photoexcitation. Long-lived states of the spin-triplet 1s(3T2) group with a lifetime of about 20 ms are observed. The temperature dependence indicates that the relaxation is governed by the Orbach mechanism with an activation energy 13 meV, which is close to the exchange splitting energy of the excited 1s states of the Mg donor.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Qubit Coherence, Noise & Stability Characterization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The relaxation of ortho states of a helium-like Mg donor in silicon is investigated by measuring the modulation of background radiation transmission through impurity centers...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.