!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
A Quantum Complexity Lowerbound from Differential Geometry
arXiv
Authors: Adam R. Brown
Year
2021
Paper ID
40776
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
152
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The Bishop-Gromov bound - a cousin of the focusing lemmas that Hawking and Penrose used to prove their black hole singularity theorems - is a differential geometry result that upperbounds the rate of growth of volume of geodesic balls in terms of the Ricci curvature. In this paper, I apply the Bishop-Gromov bound to Nielsen's complexity geometry to prove lowerbounds on the quantum complexity of a typical unitary. For a broad class of penalty schedules, the typical complexity is shown to be exponentially large in the number of qubits. This technique gives results that are tighter than all known lowerbounds in the literature, as well as establishing lowerbounds for a much broader class of complexity geometry metrics than has hitherto been bounded. For some metrics, I prove these lowerbounds are tight. This method realizes the original vision of Nielsen, which was to apply the tools of differential geometry to study quantum complexity.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The Bishop-Gromov bound - a cousin of the focusing lemmas that Hawking and Penrose used to prove their black hole singularity theorems - is a differential geometry result that...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.