Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Machine Learning
A Case For Noisy Shallow Gate-Based Circuits In Quantum Machine Learning
arXiv
Authors: Patrick Selig, Niall Murphy, Ashwin Sundareswaran R, David Redmond, Simon Caton
Year
2021
Paper ID
40716
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
162
Citations
N/A
Abstract
There is increasing interest in the development of gate-based quantum circuits for the training of machine learning models. Yet, little is understood concerning the parameters of circuit design, and the effects of noise and other measurement errors on the performance of quantum machine learning models. In this paper, we explore the practical implications of key circuit design parameters (number of qubits, depth etc.) using several standard machine learning datasets and IBM's Qiskit simulator. In total we evaluate over 6500 unique circuits with n approx 120700 individual runs. We find that in general shallow (low depth) wide (more qubits) circuit topologies tend to outperform deeper ones in settings without noise. We also explore the implications and effects of different notions of noise and discuss circuit topologies that are more / less robust to noise for classification machine learning tasks. Based on the findings we define guidelines for circuit topologies that show near-term promise for the realisation of quantum machine learning algorithms using gate-based NISQ quantum computer.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- There is increasing interest in the development of gate-based quantum circuits for the training of machine learning models.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.