Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Testing accuracy of qubit rotations on a public quantum computer
arXiv
Authors: Tomasz Białecki, Tomasz Rybotycki, Jakub Tworzydło, Adam Bednorz
Year
2021
Paper ID
40657
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
147
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We analyze the results of the test of π/2 qubit rotations on the public quantum computer provided by IBM. We measure a single qubit rotated by π/2 about a random axis, and we accumulate vast statistics of the results. The test performed on different devices shows systematic deviations from the theoretical predictions, which appear at the level 10-3. Some of the differences, beyond 5 standard deviations, cannot be explained by simple corrections due to nonlinearities of pulse generations. The magnitude of the deviation is comparable with the randomized benchmarking of the gate, but we additionally observe a pronounced parametric dependence. We discuss other possible reasons of the deviations, including states beyond the single-qubit space. The deviations have a similar structure for various devices used at different times, and so they can also serve as a diagnostic tool to eliminate imperfect gate implementations, and faithful description of the involved physical systems.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We analyze the results of the test of π/2 qubit rotations on the public quantum computer provided by IBM.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.