Quick Navigation
Topics
Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing
Photonic Quantum Computing
Superconducting Qubits
Laser-lithographically written micron-wide superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors
arXiv
Authors: Maximilian Protte, Varun B. Verma, Jan Philipp Höpker, Richard P. Mirin, Sae Woo Nam, Tim J. Bartley
Year
2021
Paper ID
40631
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
80
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We demonstrate the fabrication of micron-wide tungsten silicide superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors on a silicon substrate using laser lithography. We show saturated internal detection efficiencies with wire widths from 0.59μm to 1.43μm under illumination at 1550nm. We demonstrate both straight wires, as well as meandered structures. Single-photon sensitivity is shown in devices up to 4mm in length. Laser-lithographically written devices allow for fast and easy structuring of large areas while maintaining a saturated internal efficiency for wire width around 1μm.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We demonstrate the fabrication of micron-wide tungsten silicide superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors on a silicon substrate using laser lithography.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.