Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Gravity Relativistic Quantum Information
Cat states and violation of the Bell-CHSH inequality in relativistic Quantum Field Theory
arXiv
Authors: M. S. Guimaraes, I. Roditi, S. P. Sorella
Year
2026
Paper ID
4058
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
111
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A cat state localized in the right Rindler wedge is employed to study the violation of the Bell-CHSH inequality in a relativistic scalar free Quantum Field Theory. By means of the bounded Hermitian operator sign\(varphi(f\)), where varphi(f) stands for the smeared scalar field, it turns out that the Bell-CHSH correlator can be evaluated in closed analytic form in terms of the imaginary error function. Being the superposition of two coherent states, cat states allow for the existence of interference terms which give rise to a violation of the Bell-CHSH inequality. As such, the present setup can be considered as an explicit realization of the results obtained by Summers-Werner.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Gravity & Relativistic Quantum Information research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A cat state localized in the right Rindler wedge is employed to study the violation of the Bell-CHSH inequality in a relativistic scalar free Quantum Field Theory.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.