Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Effectiveness of Variable Distance Quantum Error Correcting Codes
arXiv
Authors: Salonik Resch, Ulya R. Karpuzcu
Year
2021
Paper ID
40489
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
125
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum error correction is capable of digitizing quantum noise and increasing the robustness of qubits. Typically, error correction is designed with the target of eliminating all errors - making an error so unlikely it can be assumed that none occur. In this work, we use statistical quantum fault injection on the quantum phase estimation algorithm to test the sensitivity to quantum noise events. Our work suggests that quantum programs can tolerate non-trivial errors and still produce usable output. We show that it may be possible to reduce error correction overhead by relaxing tolerable error rate requirements. In addition, we propose using variable strength (distance) error correction, where overhead can be reduced by only protecting more sensitive parts of the quantum program with high distance codes.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum error correction is capable of digitizing quantum noise and increasing the robustness of qubits.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.