Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Self-testing of multipartite GHZ states of arbitrary local dimension with arbitrary number of measurements per party
arXiv
Authors: Shubhayan Sarkar, Remigiusz Augusiak
Year
2021
Paper ID
40420
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
145
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Device independent certification schemes have gained a lot of interest lately, not only for their applications in quantum information tasks but also their implications towards foundations of quantum theory. The strongest form of device independent certification, known as self-testing, often requires for a Bell inequality to be maximally violated by specific quantum states and measurements. In this work, using the techniques developed recently in [S. Sarkar et al., npj Quantum Inf. 7, 151 (2021)], we provide the first self-testing scheme for the multipartite Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states of arbitrary local dimension that does not rely on self-testing results for qubit states and that exploits the minimal number of two measurements per party. This makes our results interesting as far as practical implementation of device-independent certification methods is concerned. Our self-testing statement relies on maximal violation of a Bell inequality proposed recently in [R. Augusiak et al., New J. Phys. 21, 113001 (2019)].
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Device independent certification schemes have gained a lot of interest lately, not only for their applications in quantum information tasks but also their implications towards...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.