Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
CNOT-count optimized quantum circuit of the Shor's algorithm
arXiv
Authors: Xia Liu, Huan Yang, Li Yang
Year
2021
Paper ID
40390
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
157
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present improved quantum circuit for modular exponentiation of a constant, which is the most expensive operation in Shor's algorithm for integer factorization. While previous work mostly focuses on minimizing the number of qubits or the depth of circuit, we try to minimize the number of CNOT gate which primarily determines the running time on a ion trap quantum computer. First, we give the implementation of basic arithmetic with known lowest number of CNOT gate and the construction of improved modular exponentiation of a constant by accumulating intermediate date and windowing technique. Then, we precisely estimate the number of improved quantum circuit to perform Shor's algorithm for factoring a n-bit integer, which is 217frac{n3}{log2n}+4n2+n. According to the number of CNOT gates, we analyze the running time and feasibility of Shor's algorithm on a ion trap quantum computer. Finally, we discuss the lower bound of CNOT numbers needed to implement Shor's algorithm.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present improved quantum circuit for modular exponentiation of a constant, which is the most expensive operation in Shor's algorithm for integer factorization.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.