Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Machine Learning
Machine learning for excitation energy transfer dynamics
arXiv
Authors: Kimara Naicker, Ilya Sinayskiy, Francesco Petruccione
Year
2021
Paper ID
40351
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
173
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A well-known approach to describe the dynamics of an open quantum system is to compute the master equation evolving the reduced density matrix of the system. This approach plays an important role in describing excitation transfer through photosynthetic light harvesting complexes (LHCs). The hierarchical equations of motion (HEOM) was adapted by Ishizaki and Fleming (J. Chem. Phys., 2009) to simulate open quantum dynamics in the biological regime. We generate a set of time dependent observables that depict the coherent propagation of electronic excitations through the LHCs by solving the HEOM. We solve the inverse problem using classical machine learning (ML) models as this is a computationally intractable problem. The objective here is to determine whether a trained ML model can perform Hamiltonian tomography by using the time dependence of the observables as inputs. We demonstrate the capability of convolutional neural networks to tackle this research problem. The models developed here can predict Hamiltonian parameters such as excited state energies and inter-site couplings of a system up to 99.28% accuracy and mean-squared error as low as 0.65.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.