Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Single-shot readout in graphene quantum dots
arXiv
Authors: Lisa Maria Gächter, Rebekka Garreis, Chuyao Tong, Max Josef Ruckriegel, Benedikt Kratochwil, Folkert Kornelis de Vries, Annika Kurzmann, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Thomas Ihn, Klaus Ensslin, Wister Wei Huang
Year
2021
Paper ID
40341
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
147
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Electrostatically defined quantum dots in bilayer graphene offer a promising platform for spin qubits with presumably long coherence times due to low spin-orbit coupling and low nuclear spin density. We demonstrate two different experimental approaches to measure the decay times of excited states. The first is based on direct current measurements through the quantum device. Pulse sequences are applied to control the occupation of ground and excited states. We observe a lower bound for the excited state decay on the order of hundred microseconds. The second approach employs a capacitively coupled charge sensor to study the time dynamics of the excited state using the Elzerman technique. We find that the relaxation time of the excited state is of the order of milliseconds. We perform single-shot readout of our two-level system with a visibility of 87.1\%, which is an important step for developing a quantum information processor in graphene.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Electrostatically defined quantum dots in bilayer graphene offer a promising platform for spin qubits with presumably long coherence times due to low spin-orbit coupling and...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.