Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Classical Sampling of Random Quantum Circuits with Bounded Fidelity
arXiv
Authors: Gleb Kalachev, Pavel Panteleev, PengFei Zhou, Man-Hong Yung
Year
2021
Paper ID
40121
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
202
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Random circuit sampling has become a popular means for demonstrating the superiority of quantum computers over classical supercomputers. While quantum chips are evolving rapidly, classical sampling algorithms are also getting better and better. The major challenge is to generate bitstrings exhibiting an XEB fidelity above that of the quantum chips. Here we present a classical sampling algorithm for producing the probability distribution of any given random quantum circuit, where the fidelity can be rigorously bounded. Specifically, our algorithm performs rejection sampling after the introduced very recently multi-tensor contraction algorithm. We show that the fidelity can be controlled by partially contracting the dominant paths in the tensor network and by adjusting the number of batches used in the rejection sampling. As a demonstration, we classically produced 1 million samples with the fidelity bounded by 0.2%, based on the 20-cycle circuit of the Sycamore 53-qubit quantum chip. Though this task was initially estimated to take 10,000 years on the Summit supercomputer, it took about 14.5 days using our algorithm on a relatively small cluster with 32 GPUs (Tesla V100 16GB). Furthermore, we estimate that for the Zuchongzhi 56-qubit 20-cycle circuit one can produce 1M samples with fidelity 0.066% using the Selene supercomputer with 4480 GPUs (Tesla A100 80GB) in about 4 days.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Random circuit sampling has become a popular means for demonstrating the superiority of quantum computers over classical supercomputers.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.