Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning

A quantum active learning algorithm for sampling against adversarial attacks

arXiv
Authors: P. A. M. Casares, M. A. Martin-Delgado

Year

2019

Paper ID

40081

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

164

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Adversarial attacks represent a serious menace for learning algorithms and may compromise the security of future autonomous systems. A theorem by Khoury and Hadfield-Menell (KH), provides sufficient conditions to guarantee the robustness of machine learning algorithms, but comes with a caveat: it is crucial to know the smallest distance among the classes of the corresponding classification problem. We propose a theoretical framework that allows us to think of active learning as sampling the most promising new points to be classified, so that the minimum distance between classes can be found and the theorem KH used. Additionally, we introduce a quantum active learning algorithm that makes use of such framework and whose complexity is polylogarithmic in the dimension of the space, m, and the size of the initial training data n, provided the use of qRAMs; and polynomial in the precision, achieving an exponential speedup over the equivalent classical algorithm in n and m. This algorithm may be nevertheless `dequantized' reducing the advantage to polynomial.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #40081 #67338 Provably Quantum-Secure Microgr... #67328 Faster and Better Quantum Softw... #67310 Women for Quantum -- Manifesto ... #67306 eQMARL: Entangled Quantum Multi...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.