Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Machine Learning
Artificial Neural Network Based Computation for Out-of-Time-Ordered Correlators
arXiv
Authors: Yukai Wu, L. -M. Duan, Dong-Ling Deng
Year
2019
Paper ID
40027
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
141
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Out-of-time-ordered correlators (OTOCs) are of crucial importance for studying a wide variety of fundamental phenomena in quantum physics, ranging from information scrambling to quantum chaos and many-body localization. However, apart from a few special cases, they are notoriously difficult to compute even numerically due to the exponential complexity of generic quantum many-body systems. In this paper, we introduce a machine learning approach to OTOCs based on the restricted-Boltzmann-machine architecture, which features wide applicability and could work for arbitrary-dimensional systems with massive entanglement. We show, through a concrete example involving a two-dimensional transverse field Ising model, that our method is capable of computing early-time OTOCs with respect to random pure quantum states or infinite-temperature thermal ensembles. Our results showcase the great potential for machine learning techniques in computing OTOCs, which open up numerous directions for future studies related to similar physical quantities.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.