You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Photonic Quantum Computing
Increasing efficiency of quantum memory based on atomic frequency combs
arXiv
Authors: R. N. Shakhmuratov
Year
2019
Paper ID
39937
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
101
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A protocol, which essentially increases the efficiency of the quantum memory based on the atomic frequency comb (AFC), is proposed. It is well known that a weak short pulse, transmitted trough a medium with a periodic structure of absorption peaks separated by transparency windows (AFC), is transformed into prompt and delayed pulses. Time delay is equal to the inverse value of the frequency period of the peaks. It is proposed to send the prompt pulse again through the medium and to make both delayed pulses to interfere. This leads to the essential increase of the efficiency of the AFC storage protocol.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Photonic Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A protocol, which essentially increases the efficiency of the quantum memory based on the atomic frequency comb (AFC), is proposed.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.