You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Superradiance and symmetry in resonant energy transfer

arXiv
Authors: Severin Bang, Stefan Yoshi Buhmann, Robert Bennett

Year

2019

Paper ID

39935

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

94

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Closely-spaced quantum emitters coherently sharing excitation can release their energy faster than suggested by a simple sum over their individual emission rates - a phenomenon known as superradiance. Here, we show that the assumption of closely-spaced emitters can be relaxed in the context of resonant energy transfer, instead finding that certain symmetrical arrangements of donors are just as effective. We derive exact expressions for the superradiant fidelity in such situations, finding some surprising results such as complete suppression of the rate for a single acceptor within a homogeneous spherically symmetric distribution of coherent donors.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Closely-spaced quantum emitters coherently sharing excitation can release their energy faster than suggested by a simple sum over their individual emission rates - a phenomenon...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #39935

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.