Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation

Transformation of the spinless Salpeter equation

arXiv
Authors: Mikhail N. Sergeenko

Year

2019

Paper ID

39848

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

119

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Spinless Salpeter equation for two bound particles is analyzed. We use the fact that in relativistic kinematics the spatial two particle relative momentum is relativistic invariant. Free particle hypothesis for the bound state is developed: comstituents move as free particles inside of the system. The Shrödinger-type wave equation is derived. Three equivalent forms of the eigenvalue equation are given. Relative motion of quarks in eigen states is described by the asymptotic solution in the form of the standing wave of cos(kx+a) for each spatial degree of freedom. To test the model the spin center-of-gravity energy levels for the hydrogen atom are calculated and compared with the NIST data. Complex eigenmasses for the H atom are obtained.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Spinless Salpeter equation for two bound particles is analyzed.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #39848 #69593 Local correlations in long-rang... #69591 Compact graphs and quantum auto... #69577 Real-time pseudo entropy and mo... #69569 Spin disorder competing with po...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.