Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Deep Q-learning decoder for depolarizing noise on the toric code
arXiv
Authors: David Fitzek, Mattias Eliasson, Anton Frisk Kockum, Mats Granath
Year
2019
Paper ID
39520
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
187
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present an AI-based decoding agent for quantum error correction of depolarizing noise on the toric code. The agent is trained using deep reinforcement learning (DRL), where an artificial neural network encodes the state-action Q-values of error-correcting $X$, $Y$, and $Z$ Pauli operations, occurring with probabilities $p_x$, $p_y$, and $p_z$, respectively. By learning to take advantage of the correlations between bit-flip and phase-flip errors, the decoder outperforms the minimum-weight-perfect-matching (MWPM) algorithm, achieving higher success rate and higher error threshold for depolarizing noise \($p_z = p_x = p_y$\), for code distances $d\leq 9$. The decoder trained on depolarizing noise also has close to optimal performance for uncorrelated noise and provides functional but sub-optimal decoding for biased noise \($p_z \neq p_x = p_y$\). We argue that the DRL-type decoder provides a promising framework for future practical error correction of topological codes, striking a balance between on-the-fly calculations, in the form of forward evaluation of a deep Q-network, and pre-training and information storage. The complete code, as well as ready-to-use decoders (pre-trained networks), can be found in the repository https://github.com/mats-granath/toric-RL-decoder.
Paper Tools
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.