Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Foundations
Bell Inequalities From No-Signalling Distributions
arXiv
Authors: Thomas Cope, Roger Colbeck
Year
2018
Paper ID
39404
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
175
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A Bell inequality is a constraint on a set of correlations whose violation can be used to certify non-locality. They are instrumental for device-independent tasks such as key distribution or randomness expansion. In this work we consider bipartite Bell inequalities where two parties have mA and mB possible inputs and give nA and nB possible outputs, referring to this as the \(mA, mB, nA, nB\) scenario. By exploiting knowledge of the set of extremal no-signalling distributions, we find all 175 Bell inequality classes in the (4, 4, 2, 2) scenario, as well as providing a partial list of 18277 classes in the (4, 5, 2, 2) scenario. We also use a probabilistic algorithm to obtain 5 classes of inequality in the (2, 3, 3, 2) scenario, which we confirmed to be complete, 25 classes in the (3, 3, 2, 3) scenario, and a partial list of 21170 classes in the (3, 3, 3, 3) scenario. Our inequalities are given in supplementary files. Finally, we discuss the application of these inequalities to the detection loophole problem, and provide new lower bounds on the detection efficiency threshold for small numbers of inputs and outputs.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A Bell inequality is a constraint on a set of correlations whose violation can be used to certify non-locality.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.