Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Leggett-Garg tests of macro-realism for dynamical cat-states evolving in a nonlinear medium
arXiv
Authors: Manushan Thenabadu, Margaret Reid
Year
2018
Paper ID
39341
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
149
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We show violations of Leggett-Garg inequalities to be possible for single-mode cat-states evolving dynamically in the presence of a nonlinear quantum interaction arising from, for instance, a Kerr medium. In order to prove the results, we derive a generalised version of the Leggett-Garg inequality involving different cat-states at different times. The violations demonstrate failure of the premise of macro-realism as defined by Leggett and Garg, provided extra assumptions associated with experimental tests are valid. With the additional assumption of stationarity, violations of the Leggett-Garg inequality are predicted for the multi-component cat-states observed in the Bose-Einstein condensate and superconducting circuit experiments of Greiner et al. (Nature 419, 51, (2002)) and Kirchmair et al. (Nature, 495, 205 (2013)). The violations demonstrate a mesoscopic quantum coherence, by negating that the system can be in a classical mixture of mesoscopically distinct coherent states. Higher orders of nonlinearity are also studied and shown to give strong violation of Leggett-Garg inequalities.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We show violations of Leggett-Garg inequalities to be possible for single-mode cat-states evolving dynamically in the presence of a nonlinear quantum interaction arising from...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.