Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

mathcal{P}mathcal{T}-Symmetric Coherent Perfect Absorber with Graphene

arXiv
Authors: Mustafa Sarisaman, Murat Tas

Year

2018

Paper ID

39326

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

145

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We investigate mathcal{PT}-symmetric coherent perfect absorbers (CPAs) in the TE mode solution of a linear homogeneous optical system surrounded by graphene sheets. It is revealed that presence of graphene sheets contributes the enhancement of absorption in a coherent perfect absorber. We derive exact analytic expressions, and work through their possible impacts on lasing threshold and CPA conditions. We point out roles of each parameter governing optical system with graphene and show that optimal conditions of these parameters give rise to enhancement and possible experimental realization of a CPA laser. Presence of graphene leads the required gain amount to reduce considerably based on its chemical potential and temperature. We obtain that relation between system parameters decides the measure of CPA condition. We find out that graphene features contributing to resonance effect in graphene sheets are rather preferable to build a better coherent perfect absorber.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #39326 #67360 Quadrupolar resonance spectrosc... #67353 Operational Framework for a Qua... #67351 Quantum-assisted Rendezvous on ... #67347 Evidence of the quantum-optical...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.