Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum State Process Tomography
Maximum-Likelihood Quantum State Tomography by Soft-Bayes
arXiv
Authors: Chien-Ming Lin, Yu-Ming Hsu, Yen-Huan Li
Year
2020
Paper ID
393
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
150
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum state tomography (QST), the task of estimating an unknown quantum state given measurement outcomes, is essential to building reliable quantum computing devices. Whereas computing the maximum-likelihood (ML) estimate corresponds to solving a finite-sum convex optimization problem, the objective function is not smooth nor Lipschitz, so most existing convex optimization methods lack sample complexity guarantees; moreover, both the sample size and dimension grow exponentially with the number of qubits in a QST experiment, so a desired algorithm should be highly scalable with respect to the dimension and sample size, just like stochastic gradient descent. In this paper, we propose a stochastic first-order algorithm that computes an varepsilon-approximate ML estimate in O\(( D log D\) / varepsilon ^ 2 ) iterations with O\(D3\) per-iteration time complexity, where D denotes the dimension of the unknown quantum state and varepsilon denotes the optimization error. Our algorithm is an extension of Soft-Bayes to the quantum setup.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum State/Process Tomography research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum state tomography (QST), the task of estimating an unknown quantum state given measurement outcomes, is essential to building reliable quantum computing devices.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.