Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
A refinement of the Robertson-Schrödinger uncertainty principle and a Hirschman-Shannon inequality for Wigner distributions
arXiv
Authors: Nuno Costa Dias, Maurice A. de Gosson, Joao Nuno Prata
Year
2017
Paper ID
39276
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
145
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We propose a refinement of the Robertson-Schrodinger uncertainty principle (RSUP) using Wigner distributions. This new principle is stronger than the RSUP. In particular, and unlike the RSUP, which can be saturated by many phase space functions, the refined RSUP can be saturated by pure Gaussian Wigner functions only. Moreover, the new principle is technically as simple as the standard RSUP. In addition, it makes a direct connection with modern harmonic analysis, since it involves the Wigner transform and its symplectic Fourier transform, which is the radar ambiguity function. As a by-product of the refined RSUP, we derive inequalities involving the entropy and the covariance matrix of Wigner distributions. These inequalities refine the Shanon and the Hirschman inequalities for the Wigner distribution of a mixed quantum state ρ. We prove sharp estimates which critically depend on the purity of ρ and which are saturated in the Gaussian case.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We propose a refinement of the Robertson-Schrodinger uncertainty principle (RSUP) using Wigner distributions.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.