Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Optimal recovery for quantum error correction
arXiv
Authors: Sun Woo P. Kim
Year
2026
Paper ID
39138
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
202
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The calculation of the error threshold of quantum error correcting codes typically proceeds as follows. First, syndromes are measured. Then, a decoder infers the error chain and the corresponding correction is applied. The threshold is then defined as the largest correctable error rate, with the maximum-likelihood decoder corresponding to the "optimal" threshold. However, a broader set of operations could be used to recover quantum information. The true optimal threshold should be optimised over all possible recovery schemes, which can be described by quantum channels. Here, we study such optimal recovery channels and their thresholds pthopt. We introduce an information-theoretic quantity, mutual trace distance, which provides a necessary and sufficient diagnostic for sharply determining pthopt without explicit optimisation. In contrast, previous works give a lower bound on pthopt by specifying particular recovery schemes, e.g. Schumacher-Westmoreland (SW) which provides coherent information as a diagnostic to lower bound poptth. We prove that the Petz and SW recovery schemes are optimal, i.e. their threshold is pthopt. With their optimality established, we explore the structure of optimal and non-optimal recovery schemes and their phase diagrams.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The calculation of the error threshold of quantum error correcting codes typically proceeds as follows.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.