Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
In-Situ Differential-Light-Shift Cancellation for Trapped-Atom Clocks
arXiv
Authors: Jan Simon Haase, Alexander Fieguth, Igor Bröckel, Jens Kruse, Carsten Klempt
Year
2026
Paper ID
39088
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
156
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Differential light shifts (DLS) induced by optical trapping fields fundamentally limit the stability and accuracy of trapped-atom microwave clocks. We demonstrate an in-situ method to cancel DLS by simultaneously interrogating multiple spatially separated atomic ensembles at different trap intensities generated from a common light source. By operating the ensembles at set intensity ratios and performing Ramsey spectroscopy, the intensity-dependent frequency shifts are measured within each experimental cycle and extrapolated to the zero-intensity limit. This approach effectively enables shot-to-shot determination of a DLS-free frequency without requiring magic wavelengths or species-specific cancellation schemes. We validate the method for Rb atoms trapped in time-averaged potentials by introducing controlled variations of the total trap power and show that the extrapolated frequency remains insensitive to these fluctuations. The technique is general and can be extended to other systematic shifts, providing a scalable route toward improved stability and accuracy in compact trapped-atom clocks and related quantum sensors relying on optical dipole traps
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Differential light shifts (DLS) induced by optical trapping fields fundamentally limit the stability and accuracy of trapped-atom microwave clocks.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.