Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
The perturbative method for quantum correlations
arXiv
Authors: Sacha Cerf, Harold Ollivier
Year
2026
Paper ID
39071
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
197
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The set mathcal{Q} of quantum correlations is the collection of all possible probability distributions on measurement outcomes achievable by space-like separated parties sharing a quantum state. Since the original work of Tsirelson [Tsirelson, Lett. Math. Phys. 4, 93 (1980)], this set has mainly been studied through the means algebraic and convex geometry techniques. We introduce a perturbative method using Lie-theoretic tools for the unitary group to analyze the response of the evaluations of Bell functionals under infinitesimal unitary perturbations of quantum strategies. Our main result shows that, near classical deterministic points, an (n, 2, d) Bell operator decomposes into a direct sum of (k, 2, d-1) Bell operators which we call subset games. We then derive three key insights: (1) in the (n, 2, 2) case, if p0 is classically optimal, it remains locally optimal even among 2-dimensional quantum strategies, implying in turn that the boundary of mathcal{Q} is flat around classical deterministic points; (2) it suggests a proof strategy for Gisin's open problem on correlations in mathcal{Q}(D) unattainable by projective strategies of the same dimension; and (3) it establishes that the Ansatz dimension is a critical resource for learning in distributed scenarios, even when the optimal solution admits a low-dimensional representation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The set mathcalQ of quantum correlations is the collection of all possible probability distributions on measurement outcomes achievable by space-like separated parties sharing...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.