Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Conditional Stochastic Processes
arXiv
Authors: Stan Gudder
Year
2026
Paper ID
39047
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
129
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum mechanics contains some strange unphysical concepts. Among these are complex numbers, Hilbert spaces with their unitary and self-adjoint operators, states represented by complex vectors, superpositions of states, collapse of wave functions, Born's rule for probabilities and others. If we accept that quantum mechanics is probabilistic, then these concepts can be derived and they become secondary. In this work, we begin with what we call a conditional stochastic process (CSP) which is based on real numbers and probabilities. As we shall see, such processes are defined by three simple axioms. We then use CSP to derive quantum mechanics by employing a correspondence called a dictionary. We also show that the converse holds. That is, beginning with a quantum system, we employ the dictionary to derive a CSP.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum mechanics contains some strange unphysical concepts.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.