Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
HAMMR-L: Noise Reduction in Quantum Outcomes Using a Richardson-Lucy Deconvolution Algorithm for Quantum State Graphs
arXiv
Authors: Jake Scally, Austin Myers, Ryan Carmichael, Phat Tran, Xiuwen Liu
Year
2026
Paper ID
39042
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
120
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Current quantum computers present significant noise, especially as circuit depth and qubit count increase. Prior work has demonstrated that erroneous outcomes exhibit some behavior in Hamming space, enabling improvements in the output distributions of NISQ-era computers. We present HAMMR-L: a principled post-processing technique for improving the fidelity of output distributions by applying Richardson-Lucy image deconvolution on a state graph of measurement results connected by Hamming distance. We show that this preliminary implementation of HAMMR-L outperforms existing cutting-edge Hamming-based post-processors such as QBEEP while being circuit and hardware agnostic, which QBEEP is not. HAMMR-L also demonstrates clear potential for future improvements and we discuss how such improvements might be realized while highlighting the strengths, limitations, and generality of the underlying concept.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Current quantum computers present significant noise, especially as circuit depth and qubit count increase.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.