Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Local robust shadows on a trapped ion computer - a case study
arXiv
Authors: Jadwiga Wilkens, Milena Guevara-Bertsch, Marwa Marso, Mederika Zangerl, Albert Frisch, Florian Girtler, Juris Ulmanis, Ingo Roth, Richard Kueng
Year
2026
Paper ID
39009
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
122
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We experimentally demonstrate local robust shadows on a trapped-ion device, a protocol developed to counteract measurement errors. We alternate between a calibration stage and the shadow estimation stage and also introduce Pauli-X-twirling before measurements in both stages to symmetrize error rates. We then demonstrate the protocol on a trapped-ion quantum computer with artificially shortened measurement pulse duration. This yields faster experiments at the cost of increased error rates which are subsequently mitigated by the robust shadow protocol. We benchmark this approach on three exemplary quantum states: a local Haar random state, as well as standard and Pauli-correlation encoded QAOA states. In all three cases, the local robust shadow protocol succeeds at mitigating the increased error rates hailing from shorter measurement pulse durations.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We experimentally demonstrate local robust shadows on a trapped-ion device, a protocol developed to counteract measurement errors.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.